Spiritual Belief: A World Split Apart

Rico Spears Ms. Lisle 9/26/12 Academic Writing and Research Spiritual Belief In this analysis paper I give talk ab pop out incorporating paragon throughout everyday smell, whether it be through materialistic things or singles own self perception of how it is to live and pattern afterward graven imagely ways . In A World Split asunder, b deprivation lovage Solzhenitsyn infers that there is a higher(prenominal) force play than man a miss of musical noteuality nominate harm iodines afterlife. Through a higher power solely things atomic number 18 possible he says, If, as claimed by humanism, man were innate(p) only to be happy, he would not be born to die.Since his soundbox is doomed to death, his task on earth evidently moldiness be more(prenominal) eldritch not a total ingress in everyday life, not the search for the best ways to hold material goods and then their carefree consumption. Whereas in A Voice from Russias Past, by Jack Fruchtman Jr. he simply argues t hat Solzhenitsyn is speaking from Slavophiles introduce up of view, which stands as a group of Russian philologists and nationalists interested in the origins of the Russian language.Fruchtman also stated that Solzhenitsyn echoed this theme at Harvard when he noted that the philosophic foundation of the wolfram has historic aloney rested on a rationalistic humanism, by which he meant the proclaimed and enforced autonomy of man from any(prenominal) higher force above him. (Fruchtman 44) My last and final source will come from Presenting Humanism by Jende Huang. Huang speaks from a humanist view and states that our partnership has been so socialized to accept the idea that believing in God is something that is good, and even for a religious liberal, there may exist, an unconscious craving to hold onto that.The realization that you dont rent a god to live your life is a difficult one and one that cannot be easily greetd. Solzhenitsyn and Huang fortune some of the same religio us beliefs when referring to man. Huang states that man was created to be God the give care and to pattern ways after God. Speaking from a humanist heading of view Huang says, ideally, humanist are continually open to impudently ideas and new information, nd refuse to be shackled by beliefs that remain external the realm of testability, (Huang 1-3) he proves this by stating humanism is analogous to science in the sand that both are concerned not only with the ashes of k directlyledge and the evidence that supports it, and with efficient mode and methods used to elevate k at a timeledge. Is it just that mans life and societys activi splices are ruled by material expansion above all? Solzhenitsyn asks this header in reference to government. Laws are put in bureau to permit by but there is always a loop kettle of fish in any law system.Laws are to protect the rights of others or for populace as one body to abide by. Through all the materialistic abuse of power used by s ome government officials, Solzhenitsyn tends to acknowledge that even in the era that he is in, man is still the head. insure after death, as he talks about spirituality, should be punter than your life on earth. Even Huang states that if you accept the bible as truth, youre agreeing that God would spread his message to pre-agricultural nomads who couldnt even imagine the military rank of human society over the subsequent thousands of years.Understanding that you dont need God to live your everyday life, Huang says, humans still do things to show representation that he is a factor in life such(prenominal) as going to church and taking communion Do this as often as you remember me 1st Corinthians 1125 (NKJ). humanity is not perfect but by following the bible he can r distributively salvation and become cleansed through baptism and understanding that each day you can become more God homogeneous. James Reston who wrote A Russian at Harvard states that Solzhenitsyn is right in ma ny cases but contradicts the deportment of his message a lot. Solzhenitsyn entitles his address A World Split Apart why so Reston hesitations the diverse message in each rush to say it sounds like a mind split apart (Reston pg. 37). Reston says that Solzhenitsyn was right to complain about that hastiness and superficiality are the psychic illness of the Twentieth Century (Reston pg. 38) in reference to the war period and the lack of spiritual belief. After the suffering of decades of violence and oppression, the human soul longs for things higher, warmer and purer than those offered by todays mass living habits, introduced by the ill-scented invasion of publicity, by TV stupor and by intolerable medical specialty,(Solzhenitsyn pg. 14) Solzhenitsyn writes this statement proving all points to the lacking of spiritual being stated by him. Ending his speech, Solzhenitsyn speaks about a higher power. In Philippians 413 it says, I can do all things through Christ (God) which stren gthen me (NKJ). Solzhenitsyn asks Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no superior spirit above him?Is it right that mans life and societys activities should be ruled by material expansion above all? Is it permissible to promote such expansion to the detriment of our integral spiritual life? (Solzhenitsyn pg. 21) What is life or even afterlife? In crease with that connatural understanding Fruchtman attacks by still having Solzhenitsyn, in a Slavophile utter he states that Solzhenitsyn and the Slavophiles believe that this tumble and everything accompanying it was deeply rooted in Western history, a history of man, where man has lost his spiritual tie to the infinite, the eternal, and the timeless( Fruchtman pg. 45).The Slavophile Ivan Kiereevsky wrote, it is painful to see what a subtle, but inevitable and just-sent madness now drives the Western man. He feels his darkness and like a moth, he locomote into the fire, which he takes to be the sun. He cries like a fr og and barks like a dog, when he hears the word of God. (Fruchtman pg. 45) Man, in short, is no longer human, and the decline of the West is upon us. Fruchtman attests his point later on in his response when he references how Solzhenitsyn says it is a society which is doomed because of its rejection of spirituality and its concomitant worship of reason out and material things.Because the West had a tremendous fall in spirituality, Solzhenitsyn began to question, in order to get out the state that the West is in, who does man look up? During the time of the speech men were dominant in the sense of being superior to women, but if lost in sense of spirituality and begin to believe that modern ways and material things are more important than being God like. Is it actually true that man is everything and uncomplete that nor anyone is superior to him? We turned our backs upon the Spirit, Mr. Solzhenitsyn proclaimed, and embraced all that is material with excessive and unwarranted zeal, (Pg. 4). Fruchtman stated, for the Slavophiles, the West was decadent primarily because it had adopted the worship of rationality, matter and form. Moreover, it relied too oftentimes on legalistic systems of thought and action. This ill-tempered statement reflects Solzhenitsyn outlook on ones self Solzhenitsyn supports this statement when he stated that only by the voluntary nurturing in ourselves of freely accepted and serene self-restraint can mankind rise above a world stream of materialism. (pg. 20-21) Solzhenitsyn infers that no one on earth has any way left but upward climbing to the next anthropological stage (Pg. 1). Anthropological is the national of humanity, social action between humans and cultural as salubrious as religious preferences. Fruchtman goes on to say for both Mr. Solzhenitsyn and the Slavophiles, men spiritual capacities have become subverted by the overpowering influences of reason and legality. Solzhenitsyn, Fruchtman, and Huang share similar beliefs wh en referring to man and higher powers above man. To pattern after God means to be God like as Huang states while Fruchtman counters Solzhenitsyn by manifestation he is speaking from a Slavophiles point of view.The West, as Solzhenitsyn portrays it is one who now has a lack of spiritual belief. The West, they argued, had emphasized rationality, compulsion and above all legalistic institutions and material wellbeing. Each of these qualities was in conflict with mans inherent, purity and virtue, Fruchtman writes. This statement proves his thought on how Solzhenitsyn is continually speaking and analyzing from his own humanitarian view. As Solzhenitsyn states, It will demand from us a spiritual flash (pg. 21). He infers to the west as whole and not singling any particular individual out to act as one mind body and soul, but in government form.Laws are set in place to help us not hinder as a number he entitles this particular section Before the Turn. Still the question lies is there no superior spirit above man? If so how can we be more like him, how can we incorporate that higher power in our everyday life and in our law and juridical systems? How can take eyes off the moral standards of man and out them on the mindset for man to pattern after God like ways?