Comparison and Contrast of Two Legal Journals

Upon first pondering the idea of comparing two profound journals, I automatic tout ensembley summ aced thoughts of lugging a seventy pound book over to a table then blowing the dust off of it. In realism I found several journals to choose from, each with a a couple of(prenominal) subjects to select from. I chose struggle Journal of Association of Trial rightyers of the States and Law Practice management as my journals to compare/contrast. They were quite a stark contrast to what I imagined them to be, visually as well as in regard to content.Though the content and themes of the two journals differed, they were written in comparatively similar ocabulary levels and style. I saw no advantages in one and only(a) over the other, since they cover different subjects and both would most equally wax beneficial if in the possession of a Neither journal was intimidating, as I had perceived them to be in my imagination. Both journals followed a relatively similar information layout to that of PC Monthly or Car & truck Digest, in that they resemble a magazine with an editorial surgical incision and a News and Trends section.They were both written in a vocabulary that was non heady at all in my eyes any college school-age child should manage reading it easily. In the case of Law Practice Management, one whitethorn need a firm grasp on financial lingo for some of the specialized articles relating to bookkeeping, but beside that, both journals were as palmy to understand as Life magazine. Both journals had a special digest in each issue, with Trial mainly focusing on issues like civil rights, internet law, and other current issues that trial lawyers may non be familiar with.Some of the actual articles were The Violence Against Women Act, patrol misconduct, and Looking at State Constitutions. Law Practice Management eals with topics relevant to lawyers as well as other corporate professionals that may deal with the legal profession, such as how to keep good dealing with clients, how to increase your profits with legal fees. Their special feature of one issue was Ten ways to make more money, and a nonher was holding a life-long client.The journal also includes a large editorial section in the front of the magazine, followed by news on current technologies minded(p) to the legal field. Both journals had rather small articles, but most all questions posed were answered thoroughly. Though most articles were concise, there were no gaps in their eporting of the story. Law Practice Management was relatively straightforward and unbiased, however, Trial seemed to take a liberal military strength with how they structured their articles relating to civil rights.I took no plague to this, because I tend to take a more liberal stance on civil rights as well as other semipolitical issues. Being somewhat certain that I will continue to chase a future as a lawyer and politician, I view that this served as a helpful introduction to journals I m ay assume to in the future. A trial lawyer seems like an interesting profession, and Trial seems to be n easy-to-read, relaxed way of staying abreast current issues relevant to cosmos a trial lawyer.The articles are informative, yet do not imbibe on for two or four pages. The vocabulary is pretty simplistic, and should not pose an intellectual threat to any individual in the law profession. Most people in the law industry probably fatality to maximize their profit potentials, where upon Law Practice Management will examine beneficial. This journal, too, is easy reading, and deals with current high-tech tools helpful in the legal field, as well as informative tips on a lawyers people and professional skills.